Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes
    • eBooks

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2026 / April / Whos Running QC on Artificial Intelligence
Clinical care Bioinformatics Digital and computational pathology Training and education Laboratory management Opinion and Personal Narratives Digital Pathology Voices in the Community Professional Development

Who's Running QC on Artificial Intelligence?

Why we should stop treating AI as an information technology problem and start governing it like our other laboratory instruments

By Caitlin Raymond 04/09/2026 Opinion 4 min read
  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Listen
  • Report
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz
  • Poll
  • Top Institutions
  • Top Thought Leaders

Share

Objective:

To address the lack of a coherent governance framework for clinical AI tools in healthcare, focusing on validation, monitoring, and accountability.

Key Findings:
  • AI tools are being deployed without proper validation and monitoring, leading to potential risks.
  • Current governance frameworks for AI are unclear and inconsistent, resulting in gaps in oversight.
  • Pathologists and laboratory professionals have the expertise to establish necessary oversight structures, ensuring patient safety.
Interpretation:

The deployment of AI in healthcare is outpacing the establishment of necessary governance, posing significant risks to patient safety and care quality that must be urgently addressed.

Limitations:
  • The regulatory framework for AI in medicine is still developing, which complicates oversight.
  • Many health systems lack established quality control programs for AI tools, leading to inconsistent practices.
Conclusion:

To ensure the safe and effective use of AI in clinical settings, a robust governance framework modeled after laboratory practices is essential.

This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

About the Author(s)

Caitlin Raymond

Caitlin Raymond is an Assistant Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Wisconsin – Madison.

More Articles by Caitlin Raymond

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

A Patient Is More Than a Price Tag
Bioinformatics
A Patient Is More Than a Price Tag

November 17, 2016

1 min read

In patients with intellectual and metabolic differences, genome-wide sequencing can provide diagnoses and even potential routes to treatment

This Time, It’s Personal
Bioinformatics
This Time, It’s Personal

October 25, 2022

5 min read

Overcoming lung cancer treatment resistance will require predictive biomarkers that take into account significant patient variability

Sepsis Patient Risk Scores
Bioinformatics
A Calculated Risk

February 15, 2023

2 min read

How a personalized sepsis score aims to better stratify patients with acute infection

The Google Genome
Bioinformatics
The Google Genome

November 17, 2014

1 min read

The tech giant’s newest “moonshot” aims to create a complete genomic picture of the healthy human being

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.