Objective:
To address the lack of a coherent governance framework for clinical AI tools in healthcare, focusing on validation, monitoring, and accountability.
Key Findings:
- AI tools are being deployed without proper validation and monitoring, leading to potential risks.
- Current governance frameworks for AI are unclear and inconsistent, resulting in gaps in oversight.
- Pathologists and laboratory professionals have the expertise to establish necessary oversight structures, ensuring patient safety.
Interpretation:
The deployment of AI in healthcare is outpacing the establishment of necessary governance, posing significant risks to patient safety and care quality that must be urgently addressed.
Limitations:
- The regulatory framework for AI in medicine is still developing, which complicates oversight.
- Many health systems lack established quality control programs for AI tools, leading to inconsistent practices.
Conclusion:
To ensure the safe and effective use of AI in clinical settings, a robust governance framework modeled after laboratory practices is essential.
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.
Newsletters
Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

About the Author(s)
Caitlin Raymond
Caitlin Raymond is an Assistant Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Wisconsin – Madison.