Objective:
To identify bloodstream pathogens and measure their antimicrobial susceptibility within hours using a single-cell analysis platform.
Approach:
- Workflow Description: The system combined bacterial enrichment, fluorescence-based identification, and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST).
- Sedimentation-Assisted Enrichment: The first stage, STREAM, involved mixing whole blood with culture broth and dextran to separate bacteria from red blood cells.
- Bacterial Identification: Molecularly barcoded sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to identify individual bacteria by targeting bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA.
- Susceptibility Testing: Bacteria were immobilized in agarose gel and exposed to antimicrobial concentrations, with time-lapse imaging used to measure changes.
Key Findings:
- Results were produced in 6.75 to 17 hours for whole blood spiked with clinical bacterial isolates.
- 96% concordance with clinical laboratory identification in 104 positive blood culture samples.
- 98% essential agreement and 94% categorical agreement with clinical laboratory results for susceptibility testing.
- 4% very major error rate for resistant isolates misclassified as susceptible.
Interpretation:
The workflow demonstrated rapid identification and susceptibility testing of bloodstream pathogens, but further validation in clinical settings is needed.
Limitations:
- Testing was conducted on spiked samples rather than actual patient blood.
- Potential effects of prior antimicrobial exposure on bacterial recovery.
- Faster-growing organisms may obscure additional pathogens in polymicrobial infections.
- Intracellular, nonculturable, anaerobic, or fastidious organisms may require different processing conditions.
- The multistep workflow requires specialized imaging and further automation.
Conclusion:
The study presents a promising method for rapid identification and susceptibility testing of bloodstream pathogens.
Sources:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.
Newsletters
Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.
