The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes
    • eBooks

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2026 / October / Industry Insights Scanning the Path Ahead
Digital and computational pathology Microscopy and imaging Precision medicine Software and hardware Digital Pathology Voices in the Community

Industry Insights: Scanning the Path Ahead

Devika Gholap shares how smarter scanners and changing habits could accelerate the transition to digital pathology

By Helen Bristow 10/15/2026 Interview 4 min read
  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Listen
  • Report
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz
  • Poll
  • Topic Commentary

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Industry Insights: Scanning the Path Ahead

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionDigital pathology and digital slide scanning
Key MechanismsDigital scanning enables screen-based slide review. The interviewee describes potential future workflows in which scanning and AI analysis occur in parallel, with preliminary case triage. Quality-control algorithms can assess image focus and quality and aspects of tissue or sample preparation.
Target PopulationPathologists, pathology students and residents, technicians, and laboratories considering or using digital pathology.
Care SettingPathology laboratory workflows involving slide scanning, digital image review, and quality control.

Key Highlights

  • The interviewee identifies scanner and system cost, along with established microscope habits, as barriers to wider adoption.
  • The interviewee says residents and pathology students are increasingly trained using digital pathology and that some entering practice seek laboratories with established digital workflows.
  • The interviewee describes a potential future in which scanning and AI analysis occur in parallel, with preliminary case triage.
  • Automated quality control can assess image focus and quality, flag images that do not meet required standards, and identify aspects of tissue or sample preparation.
  • The interviewee says affordability needs greater focus across the industry to make digital pathology more accessible to laboratories.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

    Management

    • The interviewee says affordability should receive greater industry focus to make digital pathology more accessible to laboratories.
    • The interviewee describes parallel scanning and AI analysis, including preliminary triage, as a potential future direction.

    Monitoring & Follow-up

    • The interview describes quality-control algorithms that assess image focus and quality and flag images that do not meet required standards.
    • The interviewee says quality-control systems can also assess aspects of tissue or sample preparation.

    Risks

    • The interviewee says poor-quality slides can produce poor-quality images, and analytics may not perform as intended on those images.
    • The interview identifies high costs and adjustment from microscope-based work habits to digital interfaces as adoption barriers.

    Patient & Prescribing Data

    Not discussed; the article focuses on digital pathology technology and laboratory workflows.

    No patient treatments or prescribing information are provided.

    Clinical Best Practices

    • The interview describes assessing slide and image quality as part of digital scanning workflows.
    • The interview describes flagging images that do not meet required quality standards.
    • The interviewee notes that moving from microscope-based to digital workflows involves an adjustment period.

    Related Resources & Content

    This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

    Newsletters

    Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

    Newsletter Signup Image

    About the Author(s)

    Helen Bristow

    Combining my dual backgrounds in science and communications to bring you compelling content in your speciality.

    More Articles by Helen Bristow

    Explore More in Pathology

    Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

    False

    Advertisement

    Recommended

    False

    Affiliations:

    Specialties:

    Areas of Expertise:

    Contributions:

    False

    The Pathologist
    Subscribe

    About

    • About Us
    • Work at Conexiant Europe
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Privacy Choices
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.