The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes
    • eBooks

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2026 / October / Hidden DNA Complicates Shroud Analysis
Forensics Genetics and epigenetics Biochemistry and molecular biology Omics Insights Molecular Pathology

Hidden DNA Complicates Shroud Analysis

Human, microbial, plant, and animal DNA reflected centuries of handling and environmental exposure

10/07/2026 News 3 min read
  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz
  • Poll

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Hidden DNA Complicates Shroud Analysis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionDNA analysis of the Shroud of Turin and its associated biological material
Key MechanismsModern handling, environmental exposure, and mixed biological material complicated interpretation of DNA recovered from the Shroud samples.
Target PopulationNot applicable; the study analyzed historical artifact samples rather than a patient population.
Care SettingLaboratory analysis of historical material using DNA sequencing, metagenomic profiling, proteomics, and radiocarbon dating.

Key Highlights

  • Researchers analyzed 12 specimens from an official collection obtained in 1978; seven yielded enough DNA for sequencing.
  • More than 98% of the short DNA fragments lacked molecular damage patterns generally associated with ancient DNA, and testing identified modern DNA contamination.
  • The predominant mitochondrial lineage matched that of sample collector Pierluigi Baima Bollone; genome-wide analysis linked DNA in three samples to him or a first-degree relative.
  • Microbial, plant, and animal DNA indicated varied sources, including repeated handling and at least some relatively recent contamination.
  • The researchers concluded that metagenomic testing could not determine whether the Shroud was medieval or approximately 2,000 years old.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • The study used clean-room DNA extraction, shotgun next-generation sequencing, mitochondrial DNA analysis, metagenomic profiling, and bioinformatics to characterize sample DNA.

Management

    Monitoring & Follow-up

      Risks

      • Sample history, handling, environmental exposure, and modern contamination can complicate molecular analysis of historical material.
      • Mixed genetic material prevented researchers from linking the DNA to an original individual or determining when it was deposited.

      Patient & Prescribing Data

      Not applicable; no patients or treatments were studied.

      Not applicable; the article reports laboratory analysis of artifact samples, not treatment or prescribing data.

      Clinical Best Practices

      • The study used clean-room conditions and a method designed for highly fragmented genetic material.
      • The researchers assessed contamination and interpreted DNA findings alongside microbial, plant, animal, and proteomic results.
      • The two radiocarbon-dated linen threads were associated with documented repairs in 1534 and 1694 and were not used to determine the age of the Shroud itself.

      Related Resources & Content

      • Scientific Reports study described in the article

      This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

      Newsletters

      Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

      Newsletter Signup Image

      Explore More in Pathology

      Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

      False

      Advertisement

      Recommended

      False

      Affiliations:

      Specialties:

      Areas of Expertise:

      Contributions:

      False

      The Pathologist
      Subscribe

      About

      • About Us
      • Work at Conexiant Europe
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Advertise With Us
      • Contact Us

      Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.