The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes
    • eBooks

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2026 / October / Can BioTAK Identify Broken Heart Syndrome
Hematology Biochemistry and molecular biology Liquid biopsy Bioinformatics

Can BioTAK Identify Broken Heart Syndrome?

Blood biomarkers may support diagnosis before invasive coronary angiography

10/02/2026 News 4 min read
  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Report
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz
  • Poll

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the BioTAK score in distinguishing takotsubo syndrome from acute coronary syndrome.

Approach:
  • Study Design: The BioTAK score was developed using data from 3,615 patients in two prospective registries, with a focus on blood samples collected prior to coronary angiography.
  • Biomarkers Used: The score incorporates four biomarkers: NT-proBNP, LDL cholesterol, sLOX-1, and PAM, along with patient sex.
  • Validation: The score was validated in a separate cohort of 1,792 patients.
Key Findings:
  • BioTAK achieved an area under the curve of 0.97 in the development cohort and 0.93 in the validation cohort.
  • A score below 27 had 95.7% sensitivity and a negative predictive value of 99.8%.
  • A score of 33 or higher had 99% specificity but a positive predictive value of 59.1%.
  • BioTAK was noninferior to existing diagnostic scores that require more complex patient histories.
  • Using predefined thresholds, the score placed 89.2 percent of patients in either a low- or high-probability group.
Limitations:
  • The study did not assess whether BioTAK reduces angiography or improves patient outcomes.
  • Laboratory availability for routine assays of sLOX-1 and PAM is currently limited.
  • Independent validation is needed due to the small number of takotsubo syndrome cases in the cohorts.
Sources:
  • European Heart Journal

This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.