Clinical Scorecard: Who's Topping the Digital Charts?
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Digital Pathology Adoption |
| Key Mechanisms | Independent benchmarking of digital pathology vendors and products. |
| Target Population | Healthcare providers in the US adopting digital pathology. |
| Care Setting | Laboratories |
Key Highlights
- Only 15% of US healthcare providers have adopted digital pathology.
- Most labs perform only a small percentage of histology work digitally.
- KLAS provides independent assessments to bridge the credibility gap between vendor claims and real-world performance.
- Digital pathology adoption faces challenges including change management and workflow adjustments.
- KLAS reports assist first-time adopters in navigating technology purchases.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Management
Monitoring & Follow-up
Risks
- Resistance to change from pathologists nearing retirement.
- Potential for workflow disruptions during digital implementation.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Not specified; focuses on healthcare providers.
Digital pathology requires significant data storage and management considerations.
Clinical Best Practices
- Engage end users in evaluating digital pathology solutions.
- Consider ongoing vendor support and training as critical for successful implementation.
- Address workflow changes and infrastructure needs before adopting digital pathology.
Related Resources & Content
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.
Newsletters
Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

About the Author(s)
Helen Bristow
Combining my dual backgrounds in science and communications to bring you compelling content in your speciality.