Objective:

To evaluate the performance, safety, and patient comfort of an autonomous robotic system for blood collection in comparison to manual phlebotomy.

Key Findings:

• Robot-collected samples yielded laboratory results equivalent to those obtained by trained phlebotomists.
• The device achieved a first-stick success rate of 94.5%, consistent with experienced staff.
• Adverse events were rare (0.6%) and mild, with no new safety concerns identified.
• Hemolysis rate was low at 0.3%, reducing sample rejection and repeat testing.
• 82% of patients preferred or accepted the robotic system for future blood draws.

Interpretation:

The study indicates that robotic phlebotomy can be safely integrated into clinical workflows without compromising diagnostic accuracy or patient comfort.

Limitations:

Conclusion:

Robotic phlebotomy presents a viable alternative to manual techniques, potentially enhancing operational efficiency and diagnostic quality in clinical laboratories.