Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2020 / Jan / Predicting Prognosis in Glioblastoma
Neurology Neurology Liquid biopsy Oncology Genetics and epigenetics

Predicting Prognosis in Glioblastoma

The link between cfDNA concentration and progression-free survival for GBM patients

By Luke Turner 01/07/2020 Quick Read (pre 2022) 1 min read

Share

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults – and the deadliest. Only five to 10 percent of patients survive longer than five years. Predicting prognosis can be particularly difficult because surgical procedures are complicated and invasive, a challenge exacerbated by the tumor’s heterogeneity. But now, a team from the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania have found that patients with a higher concentration of circulating free DNA (cfDNA) have shorter progression-free survival. Senior author Erica Carpenter believes this underlines the potential utility of liquid biopsy for monitoring brain tumors.

“The assumption in the field is that cfDNA in the peripheral blood is unlikely to be reflective of the tumor microenvironment, which is largely protected by the blood-brain barrier,” she explains. “That’s why we were surprised to find a significant association between pre-therapy plasma cfDNA concentration and clinical outcome.” In a study of 42 patients with newly diagnosed GBM, 28 had a lower cfDNA concentration than the average of the group – and those patients had a median progression-free survival time of 9.5 months. That’s almost double the median 4.9 month progression-free survival time of the 14 patients whose cfDNA concentration was above the group average (1).

The team also discovered genetic mutations in over half of the liquid biopsies – but there was no overlap with the genetic information from solid tissue biopsies. “The mutations detected in plasma, but not tissue, could be an indication of the spatial molecular heterogeneity of the tumor tissue. In other words, the mutational profile of the tumor differs depending on the location of the biopsy tissue,” says Carpenter. This signals a bright future for liquid biopsy in GBM diagnosis. “The combination of liquid biopsy with DNA analysis of the tissue biopsy could improve sensitivity when detecting mutations. A more comprehensive view of the tumor’s molecular profile will enable us to select more effective treatment combinations.” The next step? A larger follow-up study to confirm the findings and hopefully kickstart more personalized treatment for these devastating tumors.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. SJ Badley et al., “Clinical utility of plasma cell-free DNA in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a pilot prospective study”, Clin Cancer Res, [Epub ahead of print] (2019). PMID: 31666247.

About the Author(s)

Luke Turner

While completing my undergraduate degree in Biology, I soon discovered that my passion and strength was for writing about science rather than working in the lab. My master’s degree in Science Communication allowed me to develop my science writing skills and I was lucky enough to come to Texere Publishing straight from University. Here I am given the opportunity to write about cutting edge research and engage with leading scientists, while also being part of a fantastic team!

More Articles by Luke Turner

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

The Shapeshifting Cancer
Neurology
The Shapeshifting Cancer

February 24, 2022

1 min read

Understanding the heterogeneity and plasticity of glioblastoma

Image of the Month
Neurology
Image of the Month

October 21, 2016

1 min read

Who Will Be The Caretakers?
Neurology
Who Will Be The Caretakers?

August 4, 2022

3 min read

Recent allegations of image manipulation in a major Alzheimer’s disease paper reaffirm the importance of research integrity

Getting to the Genetic Core of Autism
Neurology
Getting to the Genetic Core of Autism

August 15, 2022

2 min read

Investigating the genotype-phenotype relationship in autism to improve our understanding of heterogeneity

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.