Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2018 / Jan / Identifying Parkinson’s Inhibitors
Neurology Biochemistry and molecular biology Neurology Technology and innovation

Identifying Parkinson’s Inhibitors

Screening nearly 750,000 molecules for inhibitors of α-synuclein protein aggregation

By Luke Turner 01/03/2019 Quick Read (pre 2022) 1 min read

Share

Parkinson’s disease is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease and the most common movement disorder globally. Although its symptoms can be treated to an extent, there is currently no cure and no way to stop the progress of the disease. A major contributor to the onset of Parkinson’s disease is the aggregation of the natively unfolded protein α-synuclein (αSN), which forms both small oligomeric complexes and large fibrillary deposits. Attempts to identify compounds that inhibit this aggregation are hindered by its irregular and variable nature – but one research group may have found a better way (1). Daniel Otzen and his team stimulated αSN aggregation using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and then screened 746,000 compounds to identify the six most effective aggregation inhibitors using Fӧrster resonance energy transfer (FRET).

“We show that these compounds truly do prevent αSN aggregation,” says Otzen. “They just have the unfortunate side effect of also reacting chemically with αSN by forming covalent chemical bonds with it. Perhaps they can be modified to reduce their chemical reactivity while retaining their inhibitory role.”

All six compounds are derivatives of (4-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl) sulfonamide that share a core structure. Otzen thinks that their inhibitory qualities stem from interactions with the N-terminal region of monomeric αSN. “We believe that by binding to the N-terminal region, the compounds prevent the formation of intermolecular αSN interactions that are otherwise required for the aggregation process to proceed to form oligomers. Furthermore, the compounds can also bind to pre-existing oligomers where the N-terminal part is partially exposed and neutralize its toxic, membrane-binding effects.”

Moving forward, Otzen wants to take the research in vivo and attempt to apply these findings on a practical level. “We would like to develop compounds that are truly specific to the αSN oligomer, so we can provide drugs for both diagnostics (early-stage detection of Parkinson’s disease) and therapy (by binding and neutralizing toxic species). Currently, we are not limiting ourselves to small molecules; we are also looking at peptides, which are easier to manipulate systematically, and antibodies, which tap into the amazing selection system of our immune system.”

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. Kurnik et al., “Potent α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors, identified by high-throughput screening, mainly target the monomeric state”, Cell Chem Biol, 25, 1–14 (2018). PMID: 30197194.

About the Author(s)

Luke Turner

While completing my undergraduate degree in Biology, I soon discovered that my passion and strength was for writing about science rather than working in the lab. My master’s degree in Science Communication allowed me to develop my science writing skills and I was lucky enough to come to Texere Publishing straight from University. Here I am given the opportunity to write about cutting edge research and engage with leading scientists, while also being part of a fantastic team!

More Articles by Luke Turner

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Turning Tides
Biochemistry and molecular biology
Turning Tides

January 9, 2024

3 min read

A new study shows evidence for sustained human-to-human transmission of mpox since 2016

Molecular Spectacular
Biochemistry and molecular biology
Molecular Spectacular

January 8, 2024

1 min read

A look at last year’s most interesting molecular pathology stories

qPCR Infectious Disease Detective
Biochemistry and molecular biology
qPCR: Infectious Disease Detective

January 4, 2024

3 min read

How quantitative polymerase chain reaction really hits the mark in epidemic control and ID detection

Case of the Month
Biochemistry and molecular biology
Case of the Month

January 11, 2022

1 min read

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.