Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2018 / Apr / H&E’s IR Upgrade
Histology Histology Technology and innovation Microscopy and imaging Oncology

H&E’s IR Upgrade

New technology based on mid-infrared spectroscopy aims to increase the accuracy of biopsy grading

By William Aryitey 04/16/2018 1 min read

Share

A mainstay of pathology – the trusty H&E stain – may have found a new digital companion through infrared light. “I was collaborating with cancer scientists in a spectroscopic imaging program and, over a period of four or so years, I learned that H&E staining was, for all intents and purposes, the only method they had for diagnosing cancer,” says Chris Philips, Head of the Optoelectronics Section at Imperial College London. “I also learned that it was very unreliable, which generated a huge unmet need in pathology. After a while, I realized that we could adapt our spectroscopic techniques to solve this.” The realization prompted Philips to lead a research team to investigate an H&E alternative that could offer histopathologists an objective way to measure biopsy sections. Their creation: Digistain (1).

Digistain technology uses mid-infrared light to highlight the concentration of nucleic acids in sectioned FFPE biopsies, before calculating a score based on nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio (NCR). According to its creators, Digistain is able to grant an objective, quantitative measurement that removes the “chance” from biopsy grading; their paper states that practitioners agree only 70 percent of the time on the results of gradings carried out by eye. Philips adds, “The Digistain test can be performed in parallel with the standard H&E stain and is quicker overall, so it adds no delay.” The downside to the technology is – of course – the extra cost, but the researchers believe balance will be provided by savings made in unnecessary treatment plans based on inaccurate grading. Philips also offers comfort to pathologists fearful of being supplanted by a machine: “We would never propose to replace pathologists. We recognize the critical importance of having a tried and tested protocol when approaching a medical problem as serious as cancer,” he says. “We propose only that this method is used to augment and inform the biopsy grading process, and to put it on a quantitative footing. In time, we hope that the pathology profession themselves will find ways of using it that will result in the ability to make much more secure grading decisions.”

The investigators are currently testing the technology in breast cancer biopsies, but because Digistain works with biomarkers, they say that it could one day be applicable across a range of cancers.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. H Amrania et al., “Mid-infrared imaging in breast cancer tissue: an objective measure of grading breast cancer biopsies”, Converg Sci Phys Oncol, 4 (2018).

About the Author(s)

William Aryitey

My fascination with science, gaming, and writing led to my studying biology at university, while simultaneously working as an online games journalist. After university, I travelled across Europe, working on a novel and developing a game, before finding my way to Texere. As Associate Editor, I’m evolving my loves of science and writing, while continuing to pursue my passion for gaming and creative writing in a personal capacity.

More Articles by William Aryitey

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Your Newest Colleague?
Histology
Your Newest Colleague?

January 6, 2022

1 min read

The need for AI-based end-to-end biomarkers in oncology

Biospecimen Access For Biotechs
Histology
Biospecimen Access For Biotechs

February 14, 2022

1 min read

Quality, provenance, and “taking pot luck”

Case of the Month
Histology
Case of the Month

February 21, 2022

1 min read

The Art of the Laboratory
Histology
The Art of the Laboratory

March 25, 2022

1 min read

For the seventh time, we asked you to share the images you think capture the most beautiful, educational, or amusing aspects of pathology – and you delivered. Welcome to our gallery tour of the most visually striking discipline in medicine!

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.