Subscribe to Newsletter
Outside the Lab Genetics and epigenetics, Neurology, Screening and monitoring, Omics

Screening Hopes for Autism

Diagnosing ASD (autistic spectrum disorder) is often a challenge, especially in very young children, but early identification of those at risk could lead to better monitoring and earlier detection. Now, a team of international researchers are working on a blood test that they believe has the potential to be an autism screening tool. We spoke with Eric Courchesne, principle investigator and co-director of the Autism Center of Excellence at the University of California, San Diego, and co-author of the associated paper (1).

What motivated you to develop this test?

ASD is a highly heterogeneous disorder. Many genomic analyses have been conducted, which have led to the discovery of dozens of mutations. However, each mutation can only explain a small fraction of the cases, and the pathways involved in its development are unclear. This genetic complexity makes it difficult to conclusively diagnose the disorder before a child’s fourth year of life. In fact, the median age of diagnosis in the United States is 4 and a half years. This late identification is a serious concern – research shows early identification and treatment by age 2 or 3 years leads to much better clinical outcomes. At present, there is no successful early biomarker, leaving affected infants undetected and untreated.

How does it work?

We used weighted gene expression values to classify ASD vs typical and non-ASD developmentally delayed toddlers. The test uses over 700 genes in specific gene networks that we found to be abnormally expressed in blood leukocytes of 1- to 3-year-old toddlers with ASD, as compared with non-ASD toddlers. The expression of each gene is given a weight based on the gene’s aberrance in ASD and its contribution to dysregulation of the network.

So far, our test has 83 percent accuracy, 80 percent specificity and 85 percent sensitivity. This substantially outperforms all known biomarkers at very young ages in ASD, including genetic markers. A large number of genetic defects have been identified as possible risk factors in ASD, but each individual defect typically occurs in less than 1 percent of all patients with ASD. By some estimates, when combined these gene defects account for only 2–3 percent of variance. In my opinion this shows genetic markers are currently unsuitable for general pediatric screening. We are aiming to develop an accurate, cost-effective first or second tier screening test.

Practically, our test is simple: blood is drawn, then quickly processed so that leukocyte mRNA can be extracted and stabilized. We then use the Illumina HT-12 to obtain gene expression data and expression values for the genes are weighted, and the computed values are used to classify infants as either ASD or non-ASD.

Could this test be used clinically?

Our current test was a proof of concept. We are in the process of further developing and validating our classifier approach, and in the distant future, hopefully some clinical trials will be conducted. I believe that if a validated and robust test emerges, it could be used clinically. Many steps stand between successful proof of concept and actual clinical use – but a truly successful screening method for high risk of autism is very important to achieve, and someday someone will do it.

What are your next steps?

We are using RNA sequencing and new systems biology methods to develop even more accurate, specific and sensitive functional genomic biomarkers of early risk for ASD in infants and toddlers. We have quadrupled our sample size, and aim to double that again.

Receive content, products, events as well as relevant industry updates from The Pathologist and its sponsors.
Stay up to date with our other newsletters and sponsors information, tailored specifically to the fields you are interested in

When you click “Subscribe” we will email you a link, which you must click to verify the email address above and activate your subscription. If you do not receive this email, please contact us at [email protected].
If you wish to unsubscribe, you can update your preferences at any point.

  1. T Pramparo et al., “Prediction of autism by translation and immune/inflammation coexpressed genes in toddlers from pediatric community practices”, JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 386–394 (2015). PMID: 25739104.
About the Author
Roisin McGuigan

I have an extensive academic background in the life sciences, having studied forensic biology and human medical genetics in my time at Strathclyde and Glasgow Universities. My research, data presentation and bioinformatics skills plus my ‘wet lab’ experience have been a superb grounding for my role as an Associate Editor at Texere Publishing. The job allows me to utilize my hard-learned academic skills and experience in my current position within an exciting and contemporary publishing company.

Related Application Notes
Evaluation of cell-free fetal DNA to determine fetal RhD status

| Contributed by Revvity

Preventing Bias in scRNAseq Performed on Solid Tumors

| Contributed by Revvity

Enabling Efficient, Cost-effective Sequencing of the Human Whole Exome

| Contributed by Revvity

Related Product Profile
Diagnostics Genetics and epigenetics
QIAseq® Pan Cancer Multimodal cuts user interventions by 50%

| Contributed by QIAGEN

Most Popular
Register to The Pathologist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Pathologist magazine