Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2015 / Aug / New York Severs Pathologist-Patient Connection
Training and education Profession Professional Development

New York Severs Pathologist-Patient Connection

08/25/2015 1 min read

Share

Pathologists and hospitals urge New York State to revoke a bill that bans direct interaction of pathologists with patients

The New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, which operates the public hospitals and clinics within the city, have joined New York pathologists and CAP (the College of American Pathologists) in a call to repeal a bill previously passed by the New York State Senate (1). The bill in question allows patients to receive results direct from the lab upon request, but prevents the pathologist who performed the test (and understands the results) from interacting with the recipients and explaining the meaning of said test. Critics of the bill claim that this could leave already anxious patients in a worse state when presented with a sheet of paper with figures and alarming science which they may not understand. “Given the advances in diagnostics and explosion in diagnostic data, pathologists interacting with patients directly as part of the healthcare team can only enhance patient outcomes and patient satisfaction,” says Michael Prystowsky, professor and university chairman of pathology at Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York.

The bill, which ironically also blocked any laws preventing patients directly receiving test results from the lab, was finalized in February 2014 despite protests from CAP, which felt that results were best explained thoroughly by a physician when first presented to the patient in order to eliminate confusion and to address patients’ concerns (2). The state declined the repeal, however, and responded by stating, “A clinical laboratory that provides a patient with the meaning or interpretation of the test results is discharging the ordering physician’s responsibilities and such discharge is of decided benefit to the physician, precluding the practitioner from incurring expenses or expending time,” (3). This comes at a time when pathologists are being increasingly encouraged to become more and more involved in patient care. And rightly so; the benefits for the patient, clinician and pathologist are obvious, but this interaction is especially important in those cases where clinicians are not actually confident in interpreting the results of a test. Worryingly, research has found this to be true in some cases; for example, in a survey of UK junior doctors, over 40 percent admitted that they were not confident in interpreting results for laboratory tests such as urine sodium and osmolality tests (4). Furthermore, when Gerd Gigerenzer of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin, asked 160 gynecologists how many women testing positive on mammogram screening actually have breast cancer, disconcertingly, the majority answered 81 or 90 percent. Only 21 percent correctly answered one in 10 (5). These are just two of many studies that add credit to the pathologist-patient link and fuel the argument against the bill. New York pathologists have been quick to show their disagreement to the new rules; physicians located throughout New York have affixed their signatures to a CAP response providing additional arguments and references for the repeal (6). “As physicians, pathologists have a legal and ethical obligation to care for their patients,” says Prystowsky. The pathology community is not going to take this lying down. But will New York listen?

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical scientist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Letter to Ms Ceralo, July 2015, available at: http://goo.gl/RD4uvo. Accessed August 13, 2015.  College of American Pathologists, “Request for amendment to Senate Bill 634”, February 2013, available at: http://goo.gl/1qJgIO. Accessed August 13, 2015. New York State Department of Health, response to Dr Herbek, May 2014, available at: http://goo.gl/hiJWQv. Accessed on August 13, 2015. V Khromova, T Gray, “Learning needs in clinical biochemistry for doctors in foundation years”, Ann Clin Biochem, 45, 33–38 (2008). PMID: 18275671. G Gigerenzer, et al., “Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics”, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53-96 (2007). College of American Pathologists, Letter to Commissioner Zucker, October 2014. Available at: http://goo.gl/WQn4ql. Accessed August 13, 2015.

Explore More in Analytical Science

Dive deeper into the analytical science. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

The Transformative Power of Patient Advocacy
Training and education
The Transformative Power of Patient Advocacy

January 24, 2024

3 min read

Michele Mitchell shares her personal journey into patient advocacy

Navigating Digital Scholarship and Professional Growth
Training and education
Navigating Digital Scholarship and Professional Growth

January 16, 2024

5 min read

How can new-in-practice pathologists leverage the power of social media to enhance traditional academic work?

Life Balance
Training and education
Life Balance

January 5, 2024

9 min read

Sitting Down With… Kamran Mirza, Professor of Pathology and Director of the Division of Education Programs, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

An Identity in Danger
Training and education
An Identity in Danger

January 4, 2022

1 min read

Pathology doesn’t just need a place in medical school curricula – it needs to be prepared to take advantage of that place

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.