Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes
    • eBooks

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2025 / September / Can AI and Molecular Testing Outperform Colonoscopy
Oncology Point of care testing Screening and monitoring

Can AI and Molecular Testing Outperform Colonoscopy?

Researchers consider the limits of current colorectal cancer screening and the promise of next-generation diagnostics

09/09/2025 News 1 min read

Share

Credit: Adobe Stock

 A recent review in Cancer Screening and Prevention looks at current and emerging methods for diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) with a focus on screening methods and point-of-care (POC) testing. The authors evaluated current practices, diagnostic challenges, and emerging technologies aimed at improving early detection and management of CRC.

Colorectal cancer is among the leading causes of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. It typically develops from precancerous polyps through gradual genetic and epigenetic changes. While the majority of cases occur in individuals over 50, younger patients increasingly present with aggressive disease. Risk factors include family history, hereditary syndromes, inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, diet high in red or processed meat, smoking, and alcohol consumption.

The review also notes disparities in survival outcomes linked to access to diagnostic services, with higher incidence and mortality reported in certain racial and ethnic groups. These variations underscore the importance of early and equitable access to diagnostic testing.

Screening remains the most effective way to reduce deaths from CRC. Widely used non-invasive tests include fecal occult blood tests, fecal immunochemical tests, and stool DNA tests. These methods can detect blood or molecular changes in stool, but their accuracy varies and many patients still require follow-up colonoscopy.

Blood-based tests, such as liquid biopsy, offer another non-invasive option, but their sensitivity is limited, especially for detecting precancerous adenomas. Colonoscopy remains the gold standard, as it allows for direct visualization and removal of lesions. However, it is invasive, resource-intensive, and associated with risks that may reduce patient compliance.

The review emphasizes that new technologies are being studied to improve diagnostic precision. Single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics provide detailed information on tumor biology and the tumor microenvironment. AI is being applied to colonoscopy and histopathology to improve adenoma detection and reduce missed diagnoses. Integration of multi-omics data is also being explored to support better risk assessment and treatment planning.

The authors emphasize the need for screening tools that are accurate, minimally invasive, and applicable across diverse populations. They also point to lifestyle measures – such as healthier diets, exercise, and smoking cessation – as important for prevention and complementary to diagnostics.

The review concludes that while progress has been made, further work is needed to standardize advanced diagnostic technologies, lower costs, and validate them in larger populations. Continued innovation, combined with adherence to existing screening guidelines, remains key to lowering the global burden of colorectal cancer.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Flexible Solutions With FlexVUE
Screening and monitoring
Flexible Solutions With FlexVUE

December 29, 2021

1 min read

Quickly customize your immune panels with Ultivue’s new innovation

What’s New in Infectious Disease? (December 2021)
Screening and monitoring
What’s New in Infectious Disease?

December 23, 2021

1 min read

The latest research and news on COVID-19 and the infectious disease landscape

A Pig In a Poke
Screening and monitoring
A Pig In a Poke

October 21, 2016

1 min read

When importing livestock for food or breeding, European countries may inadvertently open their borders to superbugs as well

Sneaky Superbugs
Screening and monitoring
Sneaky Superbugs

October 21, 2016

1 min read

Norway’s strict LA-MRSA transmission measures prevent the import of almost all live pigs – but the bacteria have found a new way in

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.