The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes
    • eBooks

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2025 / November / When Gluten Sensitivity Isnt About Gluten
Endocrinology Biochemistry and molecular biology Screening and monitoring

When “Gluten Sensitivity” Isn’t About Gluten

Researchers continue to search for objective tools to distinguish true gluten sensitivity from other gut–brain interaction disorders

11/18/2025 News 2 min read

Share

Credit: Adobe Stock (Edited)

A review in The Lancet examines current evidence on non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) – a condition where individuals report intestinal or extraintestinal symptoms after consuming gluten, despite testing negative for celiac disease or wheat allergy.

Gluten, found in wheat, barley, and rye, is often implicated, but the precise trigger remains unclear. About 10 percent of adults worldwide self-report gluten or wheat sensitivity; however, only 16-30 percent show reproducible symptoms during controlled gluten challenge studies. Variability in study design, including the presence of fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs) in test meals, complicates interpretation.

Current data indicate that FODMAPs and nocebo effects account for symptoms in many cases. As a result, NCGS remains a diagnosis of exclusion, made only after ruling out celiac disease, wheat allergy, and other functional gastrointestinal disorders.

The review emphasizes that no validated biomarkers currently exist for NCGS. This lack of objective diagnostic criteria, along with overlap with disorders of gut–brain interaction, makes clinical assessment difficult.

The authors call for the development of immune, metabolic, and microbiome-based biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy and distinguish NCGS from related conditions. Until such tools are available, diagnosis should rely on systematic dietary evaluation, exclusion testing, and ongoing monitoring to ensure nutritional adequacy in patients adopting gluten-free diets.

The review concludes that while the biological basis of NCGS remains uncertain, improving diagnostic precision will require coordinated efforts between clinicians, dietitians, and laboratory professionals.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.