Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2025 / Aug / Biomarker Discordance in Metastatic Bowel Cancer
Oncology Precision medicine Companion diagnostics Liquid biopsy Microbiology and Immunology Insights

Biomarker Discordance in Metastatic Bowel Cancer

Researchers report HER2, HER3, and MMR expression patterns in stage IV small bowel adenocarcinoma

By Kathryn Wighton 08/12/2025 News 2 min read

Share

HER3 expression was identified in 40 percent of evaluable tumors (8 of 20 stage IV small bowel adenocarcinomas), according to a recent study.

In a multicenter study evaluating 26 patients with stage IV small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), researchersat the University of Pavia assessed the expression of HER2, HER3, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins using immunohistochemistry to identify biomarker prevalence and spatial heterogeneity. HER3 expression, defined as a score of 2+ or 3+, was present in 40 percent of evaluable tumors. HER2 positivity, determined by a score of 3+ or 2+ with gene amplification, was found in 8 percent of cases. MMR deficiency (MMRd) was identified in 12 percent of tumors, with one case exhibiting subclonal MSH6 loss. Minimal overlap among biomarkers was observed. The study did not assess HER2 or MMR gene mutations, focusing instead on protein expression.

In seven patients, both primary tumor and matched distant metastases were available for analysis. Among these, histologic grade remained concordant in six cases. One case showed a shift from grade 2 in the primary tumor to grade 3 in the peritoneal metastasis, along with conversion from MMR-proficient to MMRd status and from HER3-negative to HER3-positive expression. HER2 expression remained stable across primary and metastatic tissues. HER3 score conversions – either positive or negative – were identified in three of the seven matched cases (43 percent). No conversions were seen using binary HER2 classification (positive vs negative).

Compared with a cohort of 47 patients with stage III SBA, MMRd was more frequent in stage III cases (31.9 percent vs 11.5 percent). Stage IV SBAs were less commonly associated with predisposing conditions, including celiac disease, Crohn’s disease, and Lynch syndrome. HER2 and HER3 positivity rates were similar between stage III and IV groups. No HER2-positive tumors showed concurrent HER3 or MMRd positivity, and only one tumor was both HER3-positive and MMRd.

Among HER2-positive cases, amplification was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. HER3 expression was measured using an adapted scoring system based on gastric cancer criteria, and the median H-score for HER3-positive tumors was 127.5. In the subset of tumors from patients under 50 years of age, all were MMR-proficient and HER2-negative; two were HER3-positive.

These findings indicate that HER2, HER3, and MMRd are present in non-overlapping subsets of stage IV SBA, with HER3 being the most frequently observed marker. Analysis of metastatic lesions showed different patterns of biomarker expression compared with primary tumors.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

About the Author(s)

Kathryn Wighton

Editor, Conexiant

More Articles by Kathryn Wighton

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

A Helping Hand from AI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics
Precision medicine
A Helping Hand from AI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics

February 8, 2022

3 min read

Using AI to enhance personalized healthcare for patients with prostate cancer

The Ultimate Vision for Rare Disease
Precision medicine
The Ultimate Vision for Rare Disease

February 28, 2022

1 min read

Genomics and computational pathology can take rare disease diagnostics to the next level

A Light in the Darkness
Precision medicine
A Light in the Darkness

March 4, 2022

2 min read

Spectroscopic liquid biopsy testing – a new route to brain cancer diagnostics

In-House Matters
Precision medicine
In-House Matters

April 7, 2022

3 min read

Molecular pathology is complex – and the benefits of keeping it local are extensive

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.