Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2023 / Mar / Under Interrogation: Community Diagnostic Centers
Regulation and standards Quality assurance and quality control

Under Interrogation: Community Diagnostic Centers

How efficient are community diagnostic centers?

By Georgia Hulme 03/08/2023 News 2 min read

Share

In 2021, community diagnostic centers were launched by the NHS to increase diagnostic capacity – a national imperative exacerbated by the onslaught of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary aim? To improve population health outcomes by diagnosing health conditions faster and more accurately – thus alleviating some of the pressure faced by hospitals. To assess their effectiveness, Public Health Wales (as part of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Center Work Programme rapid review) conducted a rapid review that analyzed existing evidence on the efficiency of community diagnostic centers.

Only comparative studies examining community diagnostic centers that accepted referrals from primary care as a minimum were included in the study, which allowed a total of 20 studies published between 1998 and 2021 to be chosen for evaluation (11 conducted in Spain, five conducted in the UK, and four conducted in Canada). Overall, 12 individual diagnostic centers were evaluated across the 20 studies, with the majority of these studies specific to cancer diagnoses.

According to the review, there is evidence to suggest that some waiting times (for example, time to surgical consultation and time from cancer suspicion to treatment) were reduced. Although evidence for other waiting times – namely, diagnostic examination and time to diagnosis – was mixed. The reviewers also considered the impact of diagnostic centers in alleviating pressure on secondary healthcare. Here, some evidence suggested that the number of visits needed to receive a definite diagnosis and the number of stable patients being referred for hospitalization overtime were reduced; however, these outcomes were concluded by individual studies rather than an overall consensus. 

The review also considered cost effectiveness, which was found to be reliant on centers running at full capacity; some studies did report that diagnostic center performance seemed to be more cost-effective than traditional inpatient care. 

Overall then, the rapid review revealed mixed results. Though the authors did note that the results may not be generalizable because data was taken from studies outside of the UK and from different healthcare systems. More research is needed, they said, before drawing a firm conclusion on the effectiveness of community diagnostic centers.

Image Credit: Images sourced from Unsplash.com

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. A Wale et al., “What is the effectiveness of community diagnostic centers: a rapid review,” [Preprint] (2022).

About the Author(s)

Georgia Hulme

Associate Editor for the Pathologist

More Articles by Georgia Hulme

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Microbiology and climate change: Building a sustainable future together
Regulation and standards
Microbiology and climate change: Building a sustainable future together

January 27, 2022

1 min read

Playing Chicken With Chicken
Regulation and standards
Playing Chicken With Chicken

October 21, 2016

1 min read

Why is antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter species on the rise – and how can we combat it?

A Pig In a Poke
Regulation and standards
A Pig In a Poke

October 21, 2016

1 min read

When importing livestock for food or breeding, European countries may inadvertently open their borders to superbugs as well

Sneaky Superbugs
Regulation and standards
Sneaky Superbugs

October 21, 2016

1 min read

Norway’s strict LA-MRSA transmission measures prevent the import of almost all live pigs – but the bacteria have found a new way in

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.