Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2021 / Feb / Two Is Better Than One for Precision Tissue Sampling
Oncology Analytical science Oncology Technology and innovation

Two Is Better Than One for Precision Tissue Sampling

Combining CT scans with ultrasound images for more accurate tumor biopsies

By Liv Gaskill 02/11/2021 Quick Read (pre 2022) 1 min read

Share

Cancer diagnostics are advancing rapidly, but for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) – in which high genomic heterogeneity is common and associated with reduced progression-free survival – disease stratification needs a major overhaul.

A multidisciplinary team at the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre – with expertise in radiology, physics, oncology, and computer science – previously found that computed tomography (CT) scans can show high heterogeneity of HGSOC lesions that indicate different molecular profiles (1). “To study this relationship further, we needed to be able to selectively sample the regions – or ‘habitats’ – of interest, which requires imaging guidance,” says Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar, a researcher on the study. “However, habitats are extracted on CT scans, whereas biopsies are most commonly obtained using ultrasound guidance. This prompted us to develop a technique to target ovarian cancer habitats using CT-ultrasound fusion.”

The team used radiomics to spatially identify the habitats from the CT scans, then superimposed the maps onto CT images and co-registered them with ultrasound images to guide biopsies (2). In doing so, they successfully captured the diverse range of cancer cells within the tumors – leading to a more accurate biopsy.

Though a tremendous step forward for the research community, those who feel it most will be the patients. “When you are first undergoing the diagnosis of cancer, you feel as if you are on a conveyor belt – every part of the journey being extremely stressful,” said Fiona Barve (3), who was diagnosed with stage four ovarian cancer in 2017. “This new, enhanced technique will reduce the need for several procedures and allow patients more time to adjust to their circumstances. It will enable more accurate diagnosis with less invasion of the body and mind. This can only be seen as positive progress.”

So what’s next for the team? “The technique enables us to obtain tissue samples that are accurately matched to regions of well-defined characteristics on CT scans,” says Crispin-Ortuzar. “We plan to explore the correlation between imaging parameters and tumor biology dynamically – at different points during treatment. This will form the foundation for a more strategic, targeted approach to ovarian cancer biopsies.”

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical scientist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. L Rundo et al., Comput Biol Med, 120, 103751 (2020). PMID: 32421652.
  2. L Beer et al., Eur Radiol, [Online ahead of print] (2020). PMID: 33315123.
  3. University of Cambridge (2021). Available at: http://bit.ly/2MqC9vT.

About the Author(s)

Liv Gaskill

During my undergraduate degree in psychology and Master’s in neuroimaging for clinical and cognitive neuroscience, I realized the tasks my classmates found tedious – writing essays, editing, proofreading – were the ones that gave me the greatest satisfaction. I quickly gathered that rambling on about science in the bar wasn’t exactly riveting for my non-scientist friends, so my thoughts turned to a career in science writing. At Texere, I get to craft science into stories, interact with international experts, and engage with readers who love science just as much as I do.

More Articles by Liv Gaskill

Explore More in Analytical Science

Dive deeper into the analytical science. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Opening a Window into Brain Trauma
Analytical science
Opening a Window into Brain Trauma

January 18, 2024

4 min read

Raman spectroscopy shows promise as the first point-of-care diagnostic device for TBI

Could ≠ Should
Analytical science
Could ≠ Should

January 20, 2022

1 min read

The need to prevent the ordering of unnecessary tests

Diamonds Are a Diagnostician’s Best Friend
Analytical science
Diamonds Are a Diagnostician’s Best Friend

February 8, 2022

1 min read

A diagnostic sensor for rapid, cost-effective, and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2

Hunting the Unknown
Analytical science
Hunting the Unknown

February 22, 2022

1 min read

When it comes to human health, we cannot ignore unknown molecules simply because they present analytical challenges

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.