Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2020 / May / A Step Forward for CRC Screening
Oncology Clinical care Liquid biopsy Oncology Screening and monitoring

A Step Forward for CRC Screening

How noninvasive blood-based testing could boost colorectal cancer screening compliance

By Michael Schubert 05/26/2020 Quick Read (pre 2022) 1 min read

Share

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a field plagued by noncompliance, with many people opting to forgo screening rather than submit to invasive or “embarrassing” procedures, such as colonoscopy or fecal occult blood testing. Because previous research has revealed a patient preference for noninvasive blood-based screening, researchers tested the merits of an integrated genomic and epigenomic blood test for CRC (1).

The multimodal test uses circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect somatic mutations, aberrant methylation signals, and altered nucleosomal positioning and fragmentomics, all of which may be indicative of cancer. When applied to self-declared cancer-free controls, the test showed 89 percent specificity – but this improved to 94 percent specificity when using colonoscopy-screened negative controls, suggesting that previous false-positive results might have been due to undiagnosed disease in individuals who had not undergone CRC screening. Overall, combined genomic and epigenomic ctDNA analysis for CRC shows promise for sensitive, specific, noninvasive screening.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. J Dean et al. Poster presented at Digestive Disease Week; May 2, 2020. Poster #Sa1651.

About the Author(s)

Michael Schubert

While obtaining degrees in biology from the University of Alberta and biochemistry from Penn State College of Medicine, I worked as a freelance science and medical writer. I was able to hone my skills in research, presentation and scientific writing by assembling grants and journal articles, speaking at international conferences, and consulting on topics ranging from medical education to comic book science. As much as I’ve enjoyed designing new bacteria and plausible superheroes, though, I’m more pleased than ever to be at Texere, using my writing and editing skills to create great content for a professional audience.

More Articles by Michael Schubert

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Event Tracking and Tracing with EMR
Clinical care
Event Tracking and Tracing with EMR

January 7, 2022

1 min read

Can tracking medical events, rather than patients, help us tackle diagnostic error?

2021: A Laboratory Medicine Roundup
Clinical care
2021: A Laboratory Medicine Roundup

January 18, 2022

3 min read

From transgender health care to the power of pathology podcasts, we take a look at our most popular articles of the last year

Not Just a Sample
Clinical care
Not Just a Sample

January 27, 2022

13 min read

Patient–pathologist interactions are vital – and both sides must work together to make the connection

Video: Not Just a Sample
Clinical care
Video: Not Just a Sample

January 28, 2022

1 min read

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.