Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2017 / Apr / The Combination Question
Precision medicine Screening and monitoring Biochemistry and molecular biology Laboratory management

The Combination Question

Could CRP guide clinicians when selecting antidepressant medication to prescribe?

By Michael Schubert 04/21/2017 1 min read

Share

When facing down depression, doctors can find themselves taking shots in the dark. With dozens of different medications available – and only self-reported, nonspecific symptoms to use in diagnosis – how do they decide which patients should receive which antidepressants? Well, current methods are no better than flipping a coin – or so says Madhukar Trivedi, author of a new study from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (1). To address the problem, Trivedi and his colleagues have introduced a new fingerprick blood test that they believe will change the way antidepressants are prescribed.

The researchers randomly gave depression patients escitalopram either alone or in combination with bupropion – and also measured each participant’s C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid P component, and alpha-2-macroglobulin (2). They discovered that patients with high baseline CRP levels – indicating systemic inflammation – were more likely to achieve remission with combination therapy, whereas those with low CRP levels (<1 mg/L) saw better results from escitalopram alone.

Remission rates of patients with low vs. high CRP levels treated with escitalopram either alone or in combination with bupropion.

Trivedi believes that the results may extend to a host of antidepressant medications, and hopes to move on to larger studies that will test other drugs and alternative biomarkers. “Both patients and primary care providers are desperately looking for markers that would indicate there is some biology involved in this disease,” says Trivedi, whose research offers a glimmer of hope. Is it possible that a simple fingerprick in the doctor’s office could help guide patients to the most effective solution for their depression in the not-too-distant future? Trivedi aims to make it so. “Otherwise, we are talking about deciding treatments based on question-and-answer sessions with patients – and that is not sufficient.”

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. UT Southwestern Medical Center, “Blood test unlocks new frontier in treating depression” (2017). Available at: http://bit.ly/2n9yJzJ. Accessed April 18, 2017. MK Jha et al., “Can C-reactive protein inform antidepressant medication selection in depressed outpatients? Findings from the CO-MED trial”, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 78, 105–113 (2017). PMID: 28187400.

About the Author(s)

Michael Schubert

While obtaining degrees in biology from the University of Alberta and biochemistry from Penn State College of Medicine, I worked as a freelance science and medical writer. I was able to hone my skills in research, presentation and scientific writing by assembling grants and journal articles, speaking at international conferences, and consulting on topics ranging from medical education to comic book science. As much as I’ve enjoyed designing new bacteria and plausible superheroes, though, I’m more pleased than ever to be at Texere, using my writing and editing skills to create great content for a professional audience.

More Articles by Michael Schubert

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

A Helping Hand from AI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics
Precision medicine
A Helping Hand from AI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics

February 8, 2022

3 min read

Using AI to enhance personalized healthcare for patients with prostate cancer

The Ultimate Vision for Rare Disease
Precision medicine
The Ultimate Vision for Rare Disease

February 28, 2022

1 min read

Genomics and computational pathology can take rare disease diagnostics to the next level

A Light in the Darkness
Precision medicine
A Light in the Darkness

March 4, 2022

2 min read

Spectroscopic liquid biopsy testing – a new route to brain cancer diagnostics

In-House Matters
Precision medicine
In-House Matters

April 7, 2022

3 min read

Molecular pathology is complex – and the benefits of keeping it local are extensive

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.