Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2019 / Apr / Open to the Future
Digital and computational pathology Software and hardware Profession Digital Pathology

Open to the Future

NHS diagnostics must embrace unprecedented openness if AI is to work

By Jane Rendall 04/16/2019 1 min read

Share

There is no way any one vendor could ever hope to develop even a fraction of the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing illnesses. It might sound strange for a representative of a UK National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic technology provider to start an opinion piece by saying what such a provider can’t do, but this is a reality that all technology vendors face – and must act on if the NHS is to realize the new “tech vision” the UK’s health secretary launched in October 2018. The Department of Health and Social Care’s vision argues that artificial intelligence has “huge potential to improve diagnosis.” This is absolutely true, but that potential will only be realized if another key facet of the same tech vision – interoperability – extends to the “ologies,” and to the imaging technology on which they rely.

Momentum is building for the NHS to move beyond outdated technology, and if traditional IT vendors are to survive they must support the integration of all sorts of innovations into their products, or else suffer the same fate as the fax machine – and sooner than they might think.

Remarkably, although many companies are thinking collaboratively, we still live in an age where some diagnostic med-tech hardware suppliers force hospitals to purchase proprietary software. Now is the time for suppliers to be open, not archaic. Vendors can’t block the NHS from accessing innovations just because they weren’t the ones to develop them – and the same applies to innovations in the AI space.

Right now, within the NHS and in companies across the globe, people are developing applications and algorithms to tackle real-world problems from detecting deadly diseases sooner to avoiding unnecessary appointments. No single technology vendor could dream up even the smallest percentage of the ideas arising worldwide. Yet, if you were to look across the competitive landscape in NHS diagnostic IT, you would find a plethora of companies obsessed with their own algorithm developments, rather than the wealth of ingenuity they could embrace for their customers.

This isn’t about what any one vendor is developing. The key is for suppliers of traditional technologies, such as the electronic patient record (EPR) or the picture archiving and communication system (PACS), to ensure that they are interoperable and that their customers’ AI applications can plug into the core technologies on which the NHS relies. Hospitals need their core systems to be open platforms for AI, and my colleagues and I believe fundamentally that this is how suppliers can become – and remain – successful. If a hospital wishes to implement a homegrown application into their PACS, they should be able to. If they want to implement an algorithm developed by another vendor or innovator, following necessary due diligence to ensure that application is safe, they need the ability to incorporate it into the PACS. That should be the ethos of any healthcare technology company, so that their platforms can allow AI to flourish and their customers can take advantage of the newest developments.

Making this work means applying AI to the richest possible dataset. That doesn’t necessarily mean sharing data externally, but it certainly necessitates joining together data and imaging across the trust and thinking at the population level. Simply put, enterprise-wide image management is the only way forward. We must break down the barriers between the ologies so that images from a whole host of diagnostic specialties can support diagnoses and become integrated with information from the EPR.

Standards such as Health Level Seven Fast Health Interoperability Resources can be key in enabling this integration, but require willingness from vendors to collaborate, and from the NHS to think differently about a strategy for digitizing images and information. Only then can AI be used to look for patterns in data – patterns that can identify incidental findings that might show the early onset of a disease not originally investigated, or help to determine how a catastrophic event in the emergency room might be avoided. These are real-world problems, but only through a genuine interoperable and open approach from healthcare systems and their suppliers will they be solved.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

About the Author(s)

Jane Rendall

Managing Director at Sectra, Stansted, UK.

More Articles by Jane Rendall

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Global Referral
Digital and computational pathology
Global Referral

January 12, 2024

10 min read

How digital pathology is transforming the delivery of remote second opinions

Cracking Colon Cancer
Digital and computational pathology
Cracking Colon Cancer

January 25, 2024

1 min read

How a new clinically approved AI-based tool enables rapid microsatellite instability detection

The (Pathology) IT Crowd?
Digital and computational pathology
The (Pathology) IT Crowd?

December 30, 2021

5 min read

The pathologist’s guide to IT considerations for digitization

Defining the Next Generation of NGS
Digital and computational pathology
Defining the Next Generation of NGS

December 31, 2021

1 min read

Overcoming challenges of the typical NGS workflow with the Ion Torrent™ Genexus™ System

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.