Uncovering Brain Tumor Biomarkers in Blood and CSF

Credit: Wikimedia user Bobjgalindo.

Although diagnosing brain tumors early is critical for better outcomes, accessing biomarkers in the brain presents unique challenges – a lack of minimally invasive methods, a complex location, and the natural blockade created by the blood-brain barrier, to name a few. Medulloblastomas and gliomas are the most common brain tumors in children and adults, respectively. Genomic characterization of medulloblastomas may lead to more precise molecular diagnoses – but biopsies are risky and may not accurately represent the tumor.

Analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may offer a route to accurate characterization and diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors. In a proof-of-concept study, researchers at the Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology showed that CSF ctDNA holds valuable information about a tumor’s mutations and provides valuable information about prognosis and intratumoral genomic heterogeneity (1).

Researchers at the University of Michigan had a similar idea for children with high-grade gliomas. Collecting CSF is not currently part of standard care, so they applied nanopore genetic sequencing technology through a handheld device to investigate actionable alterations in patient CSF samples, which they confirmed with well-established methods (2). “This approach suggests we can rapidly and reliably detect key tumor-driving mutations in high-grade gliomas with very small samples – overcoming some of the barriers that were preventing the use of spinal cord fluid in diagnosing and monitoring these patients,” said principal investigator Carl Koschmann (3).

In a third study, researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital investigated TERT mutations – common promoters of tumor growth not previously detected in circulating free DNA of gliomas. A new digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) blood test compared glioma patients’ blood samples with their tumor biopsy tissue (4). The test accurately detected two TERT gene mutations with a 62.5 percent sensitivity rate – significantly higher than other assays that detect TERT mutations in the blood.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

I have read and understand the Privacy Notice*

Subscribe

References

1. L Escudero et al., Nat Commun, 27, 5376 (2020). PMID: 33110059.
2. AK Bruzek et al., Clin Cancer Res, [Online ahead of print] (2020). PMID: 33087334.
3. University of Michigan (2020). Available at: https://bit.ly/3krDLQG.
4. K Muralidharan et al., Clin Cancer Res, [Online ahead of print] (2020). PMID: 33051308.

About the Author(s)

Liv Gaskill

During my undergraduate degree in psychology and Master’s in neuroimaging for clinical and cognitive neuroscience, I realized the tasks my classmates found tedious – writing essays, editing, proofreading – were the ones that gave me the greatest satisfaction. I quickly gathered that rambling on about science in the bar wasn’t exactly riveting for my non-scientist friends, so my thoughts turned to a career in science writing. At Texere, I get to craft science into stories, interact with international experts, and engage with readers who love science just as much as I do.

More Articles by Liv Gaskill