Subscribe to Newsletter
Diagnostics Genetics and epigenetics, Oncology, Screening and monitoring

Secrets of the Cervical Cells

“Cancer development is complex, with both germline genetic and non-genetic influences playing an essential role,” says Martin Widschwendter, explaining the inspiration behind two new papers investigating the DNA methylome of cervical cells as a predictor of breast and ovarian cancer prognosis (1,2). “The underlying and principal drive to our work is to develop novel, easy-to-apply primary and secondary cancer preventive measures,” he continues. “To achieve this, we need to understand who is at high risk of developing cancer.”

The team chose to study epithelial cells in both studies – why? Widschwendter says there were multiple reasons behind the decision. “The matrix that reflects influencing factors is the epigenome – and, metaphorically speaking, these risk factors leave an epigenetic footprint. The tissue from which this epigenetic footprint comes needs to satisfy three main requirements: i) the cells that act as a surrogate for the cells of origin must be easily accessible, because we cannot perform biopsies or surgical procedures to obtain at-risk tissue when the main purpose is to identify at-risk individuals; ii) the cancers of interest originate from epithelial cells and, because the epigenome in epithelial cells differs drastically to that in blood cells, the surrogate tissue must be an epithelial tissue; and iii) surrogate tissue must be hormone-sensitive, because several risk factors for breast and ovarian cancer are hormonal. The only tissue that meets all three of these requirements is that obtained from a cervical smear sample: easy to access, hormone-sensitive epithelial cells.”

In the studies, the researchers developed two indices for predicting risk in breast and ovarian cancer patients. “The Women’s Risk Identification for Breast Cancer (WID-BC) and Ovarian Cancer (WID-OC) indices are epigenetic (DNA methylation) signatures in cervical smear samples,” explains Widschwendter. “They are based on the combination of DNA methylation levels at several CpG sites. WID indices were derived by comparing DNA methylation in samples from women with and without cancer.”

What makes the studies unique is that they selectively included women whose cancers had characteristics already known to be associated with poorer outcomes. “By including women with these types of cancer, we ensured that the WID indices were designed to predict cancers with the worst prognoses,” says Widschwendter. “We know that breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and that some cancers are overdiagnosed – leading to harms associated with overtreatment. By designing our test to identify cancers with the poorest prognoses, we aim to avoid this type of overdiagnosis.”

The WID indices have great potential for supporting pathologists and laboratory medicine professionals working in cancer prognostics, which could positively impact patient outcomes. Widschwendter says, “We are hopeful that, in the not-too-distant future, a WID test result derived from a cervical smear sample will afford women the opportunity to understand not only their risk for cervical cancer, but also their risk for endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer. This will lead to tailored advice regarding primary and secondary preventive measures, and we will continue to work with pathologists and laboratory medicine professionals to achieve these goals. There is also great promise in the WID-test approach to be utilized and delivered in a self-sampling setting.

Receive content, products, events as well as relevant industry updates from The Pathologist and its sponsors.
Stay up to date with our other newsletters and sponsors information, tailored specifically to the fields you are interested in

When you click “Subscribe” we will email you a link, which you must click to verify the email address above and activate your subscription. If you do not receive this email, please contact us at [email protected].
If you wish to unsubscribe, you can update your preferences at any point.

  1. JE Barrett et al., Nat Commun, 13, 449 (2022). PMID: 35105882.
  2. JE Barrett et al., Nat Commun, 13, 448 (2022). PMID: 35105887.
About the Author
Liv Gaskill

During my undergraduate degree in psychology and Master’s in neuroimaging for clinical and cognitive neuroscience, I realized the tasks my classmates found tedious – writing essays, editing, proofreading – were the ones that gave me the greatest satisfaction. I quickly gathered that rambling on about science in the bar wasn’t exactly riveting for my non-scientist friends, so my thoughts turned to a career in science writing. At Texere, I get to craft science into stories, interact with international experts, and engage with readers who love science just as much as I do.

Register to The Pathologist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Pathologist magazine