Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2015 / Apr / Hitting the Mark
Oncology Regulation and standards Oncology Biochemistry and molecular biology Molecular Pathology

Hitting the Mark

By Roisin McGuigan 04/27/2015 1 min read

Share

New US guidelines for colorectal cancer testing highlight the importance of molecular markers

Draft guidelines designed to address the evaluation of molecular markers in colorectal cancer (CRC) have been released by a partnership of US pathology and oncology societies (1). The group hopes that the multidisciplinary guidance will provide useful recommendations on everything from sample collection to diagnostics and follow up, with a stated aim of improving and optimizing personalized care for patients.

Sponsored by the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), each society was represented by a co-chair. A panel of over 25 different experts in oncology and pathology was also involved – a truly collective effort. So why were the guidelines needed? “While other CRC guidelines have been published, they tend to focus on one marker or a small panel of markers for one specific clinical use, unlike the collaborative multidisciplinary approach for this guideline,” says Stanley Hamilton, the CAP co-chair of the project. “This guideline addresses all current molecular markers that can impact treatment decisions for patients with CRC. To date, there isn’t an evidence-based guideline that’s quite as all-encompassing and patient-centered as this one.” The document provides guidance for pathologists on which molecular markers to use for which patients (see Table 1), as well as recommendations on appropriate sampling and testing methods, turnaround times, and test prioritization.

Table 1. Recommendations made by the ASCP/CAP/AMP/ASCO guidelines on which molecular marker tests should be performed on patients with CRC.

The draft guidelines were made available online from March 30 to April 22, 2015, in order to allow comments from the healthcare community, with feedback welcomed. The guidelines also acknowledged testing methods still under development; “Given the rapid evolution of the field, we have ‘future proofed’ the document with a research section that acknowledges molecular markers and tests on the horizon. We intend to review these recommendations regularly,” says ASCO co-chair, Carmen Allegra.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. American Society for Clinical Oncology, “ASCP, CAP, AMP, and ASCO Issue Draft Colorectal Cancer Molecular Marker Testing Guideline and Announce Opening of Public Comment Period”, (2015). Accessed April 16, 2015.

About the Author(s)

Roisin McGuigan

I have an extensive academic background in the life sciences, having studied forensic biology and human medical genetics in my time at Strathclyde and Glasgow Universities. My research, data presentation and bioinformatics skills plus my ‘wet lab’ experience have been a superb grounding for my role as an Associate Editor at Texere Publishing. The job allows me to utilize my hard-learned academic skills and experience in my current position within an exciting and contemporary publishing company.

More Articles by Roisin McGuigan

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Microbiology and climate change: Building a sustainable future together
Regulation and standards
Microbiology and climate change: Building a sustainable future together

January 27, 2022

1 min read

Playing Chicken With Chicken
Regulation and standards
Playing Chicken With Chicken

October 21, 2016

1 min read

Why is antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter species on the rise – and how can we combat it?

A Pig In a Poke
Regulation and standards
A Pig In a Poke

October 21, 2016

1 min read

When importing livestock for food or breeding, European countries may inadvertently open their borders to superbugs as well

Sneaky Superbugs
Regulation and standards
Sneaky Superbugs

October 21, 2016

1 min read

Norway’s strict LA-MRSA transmission measures prevent the import of almost all live pigs – but the bacteria have found a new way in

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.