Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2023 / Aug / Doggy Diagnostics
Screening and monitoring Infectious Disease

Doggy Diagnostics

These snouts have clout

By George Francis Lee 08/18/2023 News 3 min read

Share

People love dogs. People hate COVID-19. Two almost universal truths. It feels inevitable, then, that researchers would attempt to involve our four-legged friends into the fight against the now-endemic disease.

A recent review that examined 29 peer-reviewed papers on the power of pooches’ noses has found that dogs’ detection skills can sometimes rival that of standard RT-PCR testing (1).

“The collective results described in our review paper are quite impressive,” says Tommy Dickey, first author on the paper. “The accuracy of the trained scent dog method is comparable to, or in some cases superior to, the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test and the antigen test.”

Dickey, who was previously Distinguished Professor Emeritus and Secretary of the Navy and Chief of Naval Operations Chair in Ocean Sciences at the University of California Santa Barbara, began to focus on therapy dog work after being treated for cancer seven years ago.

The recent paper aimed to evaluate how effective dog scent is when used for COVID-19 screening – and sought to follow up the team’s earlier review, published in 2021 (2). How did the dogs do? Arguably, better than some standard methods.

One of the studies reviewed in the paper found that the dogs they tested displayed a  sensitivity 1000 times greater than scientific instruments. This, Dickey says, is the equivalent of detecting a single drop of odorous substance in a body of water bigger than 10 olympic size swimming pools.

“They can detect variants of COVID-19, along with asymptotic, pre-symptomatic, and long COVID-19, as well as symptomatic COVID-19 – even in the presence of other viral respiratory viruses. Furthermore, trained scent dogs have been effectively used to directly sniff individuals to provide quick (seconds to minutes), non-intrusive, and accurate results in public settings including schools, airports, metros, and concerts.”

The review presents dogs as a simple, cost-effective, and environmentally conscious alternative to RT-PCR testing. Surprisingly, one of the peer-reviewed papers examined in the review even claims that scent dog screening could be the new “gold standard” replacement to RT-PCR. “They used Bayesian statistical analyses in their scent dog study which sampled 3134 nasal swabs and found that the sensitivity of their scent dog-based test was superior to the RT-PCR test. In addition, the specificity of the two testing methods were nearly identical. They concluded that the scent dog method, with its high sensitivity, short turn-around-time, low cost, less invasiveness, and ease of application ‘lends itself as a better alternative to the RT-PCR in screening for COVID-19 in asymptomatic individuals,’” Dickey explains.

There are some caveats. More studies with an increased number of dogs is required to gain a greater understanding of their diagnostic abilities. “More work in developing target disease samples and research is needed in different public settings,” says Dickey.

“Perhaps the greatest challenge to the use of medical scent dogs is the implementation of wide-spread, large-scale programs, which will require governmental funding and development of infrastructure that is responsible for certification, protocol standards, and deployments,” he adds. 

Dickey hopes that the buzz drawn by the review demonstrates a hunger for dog-assisted diagnostics. “Acceptance of scent dogs for routine disease diagnostics depends on recognition of their value and dependability as perceived by the medical and public communities as well as governmental agencies. It is our feeling that the work described in our recent COVID-19 scent dog review represents a major needed demonstration of how effective and practical trained scent dogs can be in clinical and even public settings,” he says.

Image Credit: Leonardo Merlo / Pexels.com

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. T Dickey, H Junqueira, “COVID-19 scent dog research highlights and synthesis during the pandemic of December 2019-April 2023,” J Osteopath Med, [Online ahead of print] (2023). PMID: 37452676.
  2. T Dickey et al., “Toward the use of medical scent dogs for COVID-19 screening,” J Osteopath Med, 1, 141 (2021). PMID: 33567089.

About the Author(s)

George Francis Lee

Interested in how disease interacts with our world. Writing stories covering subjects like politics, society, and climate change.

More Articles by George Francis Lee

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

The Viral Frontier
Infectious Disease
The Viral Frontier

January 23, 2024

1 min read

The latest on the UK COVID-19 inquiry

What’s New in Infectious Disease? (December 2021)
Infectious Disease
What’s New in Infectious Disease?

December 23, 2021

1 min read

The latest research and news on COVID-19 and the infectious disease landscape

Immunology Insights
Infectious Disease
Immunology Insights

January 13, 2022

1 min read

The latest research in pathology and laboratory medicine

Pneumocystis Mysteries
Infectious Disease
Pneumocystis Mysteries

January 21, 2022

1 min read

What is the correct name for this pneumonia-causing pathogen?

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.