Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2017 / May / DIY Pathology Panic
Regulation and standards Genetics and epigenetics Omics Molecular Pathology

DIY Pathology Panic

Can genetic home test kits ever be a good thing?

05/19/2017 1 min read

Share

“We just found out that she’s at a high risk of getting cancer. And she’s not even 40 yet,” said a gentleman ahead of me in the supermarket line. He was loud, so I couldn’t avoid listening to the rest – but I’ll admit I was also curious. The gist was this: his wife had surgery to remove a brain tumor last year, and decided to order a genetic home test kit to be aware of any other conditions that she might expect later in life. The gentleman didn’t specify the cancer type, but was adamant that his wife would be afflicted by the disease at some point in the future. Thinking back, I wish I had intervened and reassured him that the test was in no way definitive. Instead I kept silent, believing it was not my place to say anything.

The conversation took place just a few weeks after I read that 23andMe had gained the green light from the FDA to market its genetic tests direct to consumers for 10 conditions (1). It was the very first such approval and a huge win for the manufacturer – and I honestly felt unnerved by it. Not because I was wary of the strength or validity of the trial data presented by 23andMe in support of the approval, but because of the impact that widespread marketing of these tests could have on the general public. In the regulator’s press release, the director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health reminded, “It is important that people understand that genetic risk is just one piece of the bigger puzzle, it does not mean they will or won’t ultimately develop a disease.” Will they really understand that? And will the manufacturer make it abundantly clear that its test is not a disease predictor or diagnostic but simply a disease-risk indicator? The gentleman in the supermarket went on to say that his wife had made dietary changes to try and improve her chances of avoiding the dreaded “C.” If the test has encouraged someone to opt for a healthier lifestyle, that’s a good thing, isn’t it? But we’re approaching Mother’s Day here in the US and a TV commercial re-awoke the pessimist in me. It began: “This Mother’s Day, enjoy $20 off when you order your kit at 23andMe.com,” (with free gift wrapping!), and concluded with a little girl gushing, “I love you, Mom.” Terrifying. Let’s see what the long-term outcome is – public panic or healthier lifestyle choices? I’m hoping the “CynicalMe.com” is proven wrong on this occasion.

Fedra Pavlou

Editor

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration, “FDA allows marketing of first direct-to-consumer tests that provide genetic risk information for certain conditions” (2017). Available at: http://bit.ly/2oIy6gc. Accessed May 15, 2017.

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Microbiology and climate change: Building a sustainable future together
Regulation and standards
Microbiology and climate change: Building a sustainable future together

January 27, 2022

1 min read

Playing Chicken With Chicken
Regulation and standards
Playing Chicken With Chicken

October 21, 2016

1 min read

Why is antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter species on the rise – and how can we combat it?

A Pig In a Poke
Regulation and standards
A Pig In a Poke

October 21, 2016

1 min read

When importing livestock for food or breeding, European countries may inadvertently open their borders to superbugs as well

Sneaky Superbugs
Regulation and standards
Sneaky Superbugs

October 21, 2016

1 min read

Norway’s strict LA-MRSA transmission measures prevent the import of almost all live pigs – but the bacteria have found a new way in

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.