Deep Learning Diagnostics for Barrett’s Esophagus
Triaging Barrett’s esophagus diagnosis to detect early signs of esophageal adenocarcinoma
Olivia Gaskill | | Quick Read
With Barrett’s esophagus patients at a significantly higher risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma than the average person, the need for early diagnosis and monitoring is vital (1). To meet this need, researchers have developed and trained a deep learning algorithm to analyze samples from a Cytosponge-TFF3 test (2) – a device that collects cells from the lining of the esophagus, allowing patient triage for endoscopy. “The pathology analysis workflow for Cytosponge is laborious, but it consists of repetitive elements that can be automated using computational pathology to find cases where the automated analysis breaks down and human experts are required,” says lead researcher Marcel Gehrung.
The system was trained to triage samples based on a two-variable, two-step process. “We defined two different scores (quality and diagnosis) and divided them into three tiers (no/low/high confidence),” explains Gehrung. “For combinations of no/low confidence between quality and diagnosis, we then decide that the sample should be analyzed by a human expert, rather than an automated algorithm.”
The tool has clear benefits for laboratory medicine professionals, not least in reducing pathologists’ workload by 57 percent while maintaining diagnostic standards (2). “It enables pathologists to focus more time on difficult cases – therefore reducing error rates due to increasing workload,” says Gehrung. “It can also help to build more trust in (semi-)automated analyses because the ‘easy’ cases are those in which automated performance can best demonstrate its use.”
But that’s not all – it can also fit seamlessly into the existing laboratory workflow. “A tool like this can be used on whole-slide images immediately after scanning,” says Gehrung. “The algorithm then decides whether a human is required or its own assessment is confident enough. If a human needs to review the case, then it follows the normal analysis pathway – but if the algorithm produces the report, then no human involvement is required.”
Though the algorithm won’t replace pathologists’ valuable role in the patient pathway, it could help them deliver the best possible service for Barrett’s esophagus patients whose risk of esophageal cancer might otherwise go undetected.
Subscribe to The Pathologist Newsletters
- P Gatenby et al., World J Gastroenterol, 20, 9611 (2014). PMID: 25071359.
- M Gehrung et al., Nat Med, [Online ahead of print] (2021). PMID: 33859411.